Trafficware Trafficware
Trafficware Ltd    Trafficware Forum    Trafficware Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Synchro™ 7    Intersections on separate rings
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Junior Member
Posted
If you have two intersections that are controlled by a single controller, it is always required that you put them on different rings.

The intersection that I am looking at is very simple. Two closely spaced T intersections. I have coded the overlapping through movements already to allow minor road traffic to proceed through the area between the two intersections without stopping. The resulting phasing did not put each intersection on its own ring. In the manual, it is stated that it is best to have them on a separate ring. Can anyone offer some more explaination on why that would be better than my current configuration? Thanks...
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Thu October 29 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of John Albeck
Posted Hide Post
Hi Matt,

You can put the intersections in the same ring if you wish (if that is your design). If using different rings, it does give some flexiblity in allowing some phases to terminate at different times. If they are coded as the same phase, they are tied together and you'd loose some of this flexiblity.

Thanks,

John.


John Albeck
Trafficware
 
Posts: 1119 | Registered: Fri March 14 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Matt, you can manually assign phase numbers by typing in the phae number under protected/permitted/detection phases on the signal page. You can code for more than one phase if the numbers you entere are separated by a space, ie "4 5" or "11 2" or whatever.
 
Posts: 187 | Registered: Mon May 05 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Trafficware Ltd    Trafficware Forum    Trafficware Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Synchro™ 7    Intersections on separate rings

© 2006 Trafficware Ltd